Category Archives: Editorial

Dec 21

Herman: Course correction needed for Colorado’s economic outlook

Posted on by

December 20, 2024 By Nash Herman

The University of Colorado’s Leeds School of Business recently released their 60th annual Business Outlook for 2025, and, despite a moderate outlook  in 2025, the report includes some disturbing trends in the Colorado economy.  Let’s take a look at some of what’s going wrong.

Troubling trends

As pointed out by Denver Post business writer Aldo Svaldi, Colorado was the fifth fastest growing economy in the country in the last 15 years, but was 41st this year.

In terms of personal income growth, Colorado moved from third to 39th.

Although Colorado only moved down from sixth to 15th for employment growth, it comes with the caveat that the job gains this year were skewed toward government, education and healthcare, and leisure and hospitality.

Conversely, the growth of the high-paying professional and business services industry has continued a downward trend since 2022.

Fueled by slowing migration to Colorado and an aging population, Colorado’s labor force growth ranking also moved from sixth to 29th.

Taxes, spending and regulation

Obviously, some of the problems with Colorado’s economy are externally caused, like the lingering effects of the pandemic and subsequent inflation from federal spending.

However, I think there is still more to be said as to why Colorado’s economy seems to be stuttering now.

Colorado’s shift toward bigger government and away from the free market is why these problems are beginning to manifest. Over-regulation, over-spending, and over-taxation are the key culprits. To Coloradans who have witnessed the economy’s decline, the most noticeable difference between today and twenty years ago is that the state now more closely resembles California more than the entrepreneurial Colorado of old. Continue reading →

Nov 25

Perspective: Taxes — by another name

Posted on by

Perspective: Taxes — by another name

  • By Lang Sias

Since 2018, Colorado taxpayers have benefited from two reductions to the state income tax that together have brought the rate from 4.63% to 4.4%, for an aggregate reduction of 0.23%. These reductions have been much heralded by state government leaders and have elicited approving comments from a wide range of observers.

The applause for these tax cuts, however, has obscured a separate tactic that state leaders increasingly have used to extract revenue from Coloradans in amounts that dwarf the income tax reductions. During the last two decades, Coloradans have seen a steady increase in the fees paid to a wide range of state enterprises. The pattern has accelerated dramatically since 2018.

According to a recent Common Sense Institute study, fee-based revenue to enterprises has increased since 2018 by an amount equivalent to a 0.51% increase in the state income tax — so, more than double the recent tax cuts. If Colorado’s fee enterprises, minus higher education, were instead funded by the state income tax, the state income tax would increase to 7.68%, a 75% increase over the current rate of 4.4%.

Continue reading →

Nov 10

More Evidence for the TABOR Spending Cap

Posted on by

November 9, 2024 by Dan Mitchell

Last April, I shared some data showing that Colorado’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights had forced politicians in the Centennial State to return $8.2 billion of tax revenue.

The state’s politicians did not want to return the money. But TABOR is a spending cap and the rules require that any extra tax revenue (above and beyond what would finance allowed levels of spending) has to be returned to taxpayers.

This spending cap has been good news for the state’s economy, as illustrated by the chart.

But I now need to update the benefits of TABOR.

That’s because we have another year of data. And, as explained in this report from Center Square, taxpayers are getting another refund. This time, their savings will be more than $1 billion. Continue reading →

Nov 01

Article X, Section 20. The Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights

Posted on by

If you see this on your ballot, you are voting for a TAX INCREASE!

“Ballot titles for tax or bonded debt increases shall begin, “SHALL (DISTRICT) TAXES BE INCREASED (first, or if phased in, final, full fiscal year dollar increase) ANNUALLY…?” or “SHALL (DISTRICT) DEBT BE INCREASED (principal amount), WITH A REPAYMENT COST OF (maximum total district cost), …?”

https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/info_center/laws/COConstitution/ArticleXSection20.html 

Poudre Schools Ballot Question Violates TABOR & Colorado Law

Featured

Posted on by

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colorado’s TABOR Committee & TABOR Foundation @colorado_tabor replied with:
“The Poudre School District R-1 ballot title violates TABOR Section 20 (3) (c). The answer to Hi Kid’s question is “No, the District’s ballot title is not okay.”


Hi Kid @HiKidHey asked this on X (Twitter):  “So what does that mean for voters? Who is ultimately responsible for the TABOR violation? The local county clerk or the district’s designated election official? Genuinely curious.”

Colorado’s TABOR Committee & TABOR Foundation @colorado_tabor replied with:
“We recommend retaining an attorney to quickly file for a temporary restraining order and an injunction in Larimer District Court.  If any increased taxes are collected, then they must be repaid to the taxpayers with interest. The County Treasurer makes repayment to taxpayers including the added interest required by the Colorado Constitution.”
Oct 25

Should any Colorado Judges be Retained? Constitutional Lawyer Rebecca Sopkin Gives her Picks!

Posted on by

It’s not easy to find information on the judges appearing on your Colorado ballot. Rebecca Sopkin is a Constitutional Attorney and TABOR Foundation Board Member.

In this video, she is sharing her methodology for determining who to vote for, some resources for voters to use, and her picks for this year’s ballot. Links from the video https://freestatecolorado.com/sopkin/

Vote NO On 1A

Featured

Posted on by

Property tax caps have been restored in Colorado. That’s thanks to the pressure from the Citizens’ Tax Cap, compelling state politicians to address the property tax crisis in an August 2024 Legislative Special Session because local governments didn’t lower the property tax mill levies and alleviate the problem.

The property tax crisis was created because voters in local elections in the past has unwittingly voted to forfeit caps in our constitutional Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) and statutory 5.5% Annual Property Tax Cap, recognizing later it was a big mistake. State politicians had mixed feelings about the 2024 Special Session, fiscally conservative legislators thought that HB 24B-1001 didn’t provide enough assurance that residents would not be taxed out of homes. Some “progressive” elected officials thought it was horrible to provide property tax relief in response to a citizen initiative, calling it a “fecal sandwich”.

Jefferson County, like Arapahoe and Weld, has maintained tax caps for over 30 years due to vigilant citizens rejecting misleading ballot issues, such as 1A in 2019 and 2022. However, this is at risk again with a new version of 1A on the 2024 ballot. This version, like before, uses deceptive language and aims to permanently remove these caps.

The key is to share this information quickly and widely. Remind your friends and networks to vote NO on 1A to preserve the caps. Ballots will arrive around October 14-15.

The recent legislative special session caused by the Citizen’s Tax Cap implemented two key changes:

  1. Local taxing agencies (e.g. county or special district) now face a 5.25% cap on property tax increases (6% for schools).
  2. Any ballot measure after November 5, 2024, to remove these limits must clearly state, “Shall the _______ (name of government) waive the 5.25% property tax limit for…” and specify the duration.

Jefferson County’s 1A, being set before this date, skirts these new transparency rules.

Governments often use tax dollars for public persuasion campaigns and exploit legal loopholes during election seasons to get away with it. I recently discussed this in an interview with Free State Colorado, which you can watch here.

The past proponents of Jeffco 1A tax hikes even resorted to tainting our local TABOR notice booklet in 2019. The shenanigans didn’t stop there.

Our current county commissioners Andy Kerr, Lesley Dahlkemper, and Tracy Kraft-Tharp, have stepped up the attack on taxpayers’ wallets using a $340,000 taxpayer-funded political strategist, and continue to push their intentionally misleading ballot language to eliminate the caps.

Voters must reject this behavior. Vote NO on Jefferson County 1A to keep tax caps in place.

– Property owners: Vote no to avoid excessively higher property taxes year after year.

– Renters: Rising property taxes will be passed on as rent increases, making housing less affordable.

– Consumers: Higher business property taxes will raise prices for goods and services.

 

Vote NO on 1A to protect yourself from excessively increasing costs. If you can’t afford more at the grocery store, gas pump, insurance bill, or rent – you sure can’t afford removing property tax caps forever. Even if you can afford excessive taxes, can your neighbor on a fixed income handle it or your grandkids?

If you’d like to find out more information, please join these informative meetings hosted by taxpayer advocacy non-profits:

  • Arvada Library, 7525 W. 57th Avenue, Arvada
    October 7, 5:30 – 7:30 pm
  • Columbine Library, 7706 W. Bowles Avenue, Littleton
    October 12, 10 am – 12 pm
Oct 04

TABOR Wins: Colorado Supreme Court Declines to Review Taxpayer Victory Against Water Conservancy District

Posted on by

TABOR Wins: Colorado Supreme Court Declines to Review Taxpayer Victory Against Water Conservancy District

October 01, 2024

Taxpayers in Colorado’s Lower South Platte Water Conservancy will receive refunds from an illegally doubled property tax after the Colorado Supreme Court denied review of a previous decision in favor of James Aranci and taxpayers Monday. 

The District doubled its property tax in 2019 without holding a public approval vote as required by Colorado’s Constitution.

The decision is a win for Colorado taxpayers statewide and will strengthen Colorado’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR). The National Taxpayers Union Foundation (NTUF)’s Taxpayer Defense Center, in conjunction with Advance Colorado, represented Aranci and other taxpayers in the case.

“TABOR means what it says, and so a local government cannot double the property tax rate without a vote of the people,” NTUF Senior Attorney Tyler Martinez said. “We’re glad the Colorado Supreme Court declined to review this case further and left in place the unanimous decision by the Court of Appeals.”

NTUF’s Taxpayer Defense Center advocates for taxpayers’ rights across the country. The organization’s in-house team of attorneys challenge overzealous and unfair tax administration. Because of lawsuits brought by the Taxpayer Defense Center, individuals and businesses nationwide have benefitted from fair, equitable policy and victories worth tens of millions of dollars.

“We are grateful for the Taxpayer Defense Center taking up the case,” Chuck Miller, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said. “We wanted to stand up for all taxpayers in the district and protect our TABOR rights.”

For more information on the Taxpayer Defense Center’s victory for taxpayers in Colorado or to discuss the case with NTUF’s legal team, please contact NTUF Marketing Director Courtney Manley at courtney.manley@ntu.org.

https://www.ntu.org/foundation/detail/tabor-wins-colorado-supreme-court-declines-to-review-taxpayer-victory-against-water-conservancy-district