Sep 06

Colorado legislators deny move to delete ‘tax increase’ language in ballot title in statewide publication

Colorado legislators on Thursday rejected an attempt to change the title of a ballot measure in a widely disseminated publication in order to avoid mentioning that it would result in a tax increase for households with incomes above $300,000 a year.

The proponent of the change argued that keeping “tax increase” in the measure’s title would suggest that everybody’s taxes are going up. Legislators who balked at the move said the proposal, indeed, increases taxes — and policymakers should not hide that fact.

At issue is Proposition MM, which seeks to raise $95 million more for a school lunch program offered free to all K-12 students. Voters had approved the program in 2022, but it has run in the red from the beginning, given that every public school child can now receive a free breakfast and lunch, regardless of income.

Lawmakers had been scrambling to fill that funding gap in the last two years. They have since decided to ask voters to raise the tax liability of residents earning above the $300,000 threshold. That proposal is already slated for this November’s ballot.

Click (HERE) to continue reading this story at Colorado Politics.

Sep 06

The Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights is located in Section 20 of Article X of the Colorado Constitution. The text of the section is as follows:

The Colorado Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) requires voter approval for all new taxes, tax rate increases, extensions of expiring taxes, mill levy increases, valuation for property assessment increases, or tax policy changes resulting in increased tax revenue.

Titles shall have this order of preference: “NOTICE OF ELECTION TO INCREASE TAXES/TO INCREASE DEBT/ON A CITIZEN PETITION/ON A REFERRED MEASURE.”

https://ballotpedia.org/Colorado_Taxpayer%27s_Bill_of_Rights_(TABOR)

Sep 04

Ballot measure seeks tax hike for higher income earners in 2026

A coalition led by a Colorado think tank will file a ballot initiative on Wednesday to raise state income tax rates on annual household incomes and corporations with earnings above $500,000.

The ballot measure, which sets up a “graduated” income tax, would also provide a tax break for households with incomes below the $500,000 threshold.

Broadly speaking, under a graduated income tax — which is also known as “progressive” tax — the rates are divided into brackets. The lower brackets pay a smaller rate; the higher levels are taxed a bigger rate. A graduated system would eliminate Colorado’s flat tax rate.

Under the coalition’s proposal, the higher bracket would pay more so that even with the tax break for incomes below $500,000, the graduated system would still pull in a bigger net revenue for the state government.

Click (HERE) to continue reading this TABOR article at Colorado Politics

Aug 31

Don’t buy The Sun’s spin: TABOR isn’t the reason Colorado’s roads are failing, it’s lawmakers’ misplaced priorities

It (The Sun) ignores the fact that TABOR doesn’t direct spending, the politicians running the state do.

#HandsOffTABOR
#DontBeFooled
#ItsYourMoneyNotTheirs
#TABOR
#FollowTheLaw
#FeesAreTaxes
#VoteOnFees
#ReplaceThemAllForNotFollowingVotersWishes

Don’t buy The Sun’s spin: TABOR isn’t the reason Colorado’s roads are failing, it’s lawmakers’ misplaced priorities

August 29, 2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By Cory Gaines | Commentary, Colorado Accountability Project

The Sun’s Gigafact check tries, but fails spectacularly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Sun has been doing yeoman’s work lately to get the progressive talking points on our state’s budget and TABOR out there. Their Gigafact check linked first below is a great example.

In answer to the question, “Has the condition of Colorado’s roads worsened under TABOR?”, their response is a resounding YES.

Let me pull some non-contiguous quotes. As a quick aside, the amount of text below is about 50% of the entire text in the fact check, a point I will return to shortly.

“The percentage of state roads in Colorado rated “poor” by the Federal Highway Administration has risen from 8% to 24% since the agency began collecting data in 1994, two years after the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights became law.”

“TABOR is a voter-approved constitutional amendment that limits how much tax revenue Colorado can collect and spend. Colorado’s gas tax, which funds much of the state’s $1.55 billion transportation budget — 48% of which goes to pavement maintenance annually — hasn’t changed since 1991 partly due to TABOR restrictions.”

The problems start with what I wrote right prior to the quotes. Determining the truth of a statement, especially one involving road funding in Colorado, is probably going to need a deeper look than than 150-odd words can provide.

If the Sun limited themselves to a literal interpretation of their title question, have the roads gotten worse under TABOR, then it is possible to determine the truth (or not) of the statement. Yes, the two events have indeed been coincident in time. They happened simultaneously.

But if you read that second quoted passage above again, you’ll see that they do not, in fact, limit themselves to such a question; it becomes pretty clear reading it that what they then do is to turn and try to link the condition of the roads to TABOR–an expansion of the question.

This is the failure.

It ignores the fact that TABOR doesn’t direct spending, the politicians running the state do.

It ignores the MULTIPLE fees that the state charges, some of which is supposed to go to the improvement of our roadways. See, for example, the second link below which is CDOT’s Statewide Bridge and Tunnel Enterprise which takes in fees and is supposed to use them to fund bridge and tunnel improvements, bridges and tunnels which are paved (and some of which are in dire need of repair from the pavement on down to the structure).

The last bit of trouble here is the Sun’s use of the recent American Society of Structural Engineer’s (ASCE) report about the condition of Colorado’s infrastructure to help inform their fact check. This ASCE report (see the third link below to an earlier newsletter) was a self-serving effort, also critical of TABOR, and informed by groups that do not like fiscal restraint.

Do not rely entirely on fact checks by any news outlet. There is nothing special about them. There is no heightened sense of fairness or truth involved; they are just as apt to mistakes or bias as any other “news” product.

As you can see above, there is sometimes quite the opposite: there is a redirection of what they originally set out to verify into advocacy.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/08/22/has-the-condition-of-colorados-roads-worsened-under-tabor/

https://www.codot.gov/programs/BridgeEnterprise

https://coloradoaccountabilityproject.substack.com/p/asce-leans-on-co-fiscal-institute?utm_source=publication-search

Related:

An earlier op ed I wrote about bias in fact checking.

https://completecolorado.com/2024/06/28/gaines-fact-checking-media-check-their-own-biases/

READ THE FULL COMMENTARY AT THE COLORADO ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT

 

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in commentary pieces are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the management of the Rocky Mountain Voice, but even so we support the constitutional right of the author to express those opinions.

https://rockymountainvoice.com/2025/08/29/dont-buy-the-suns-spin-tabor-isnt-the-reason-colorados-roads-are-failing-its-lawmakers-misplaced-priorities/

Posted in Colorado Accountability ProjectApprovedCommentaryState

 

Tagged in Colorado PoliticsColorado SunColorado Supreme CourtDemocrat LawmakersFiscal ResponsibilityGovernment spendingProgressive MediaRoad FundingTABORTaxpayer Rights

 

https://rockymountainvoice.com/2025/08/29/dont-buy-the-suns-spin-tabor-isnt-the-reason-colorados-roads-are-failing-its-lawmakers-misplaced-priorities/

 

Aug 24

What to Expect During Colorado’s Special Session – Advance Colorado Rundown

Michael Fields and Kristi Burton Brown preview Gov. Polis’ upcoming call for another special session. It’s going to be focused on the budget, but why do liberals want to insist on taxing overtime and tips? What does polling say about this? And, there’s no question that a key public safety issue should be added if the legislature returns to the Capitol in August – it’s one that District Attorneys across the political spectrum agree must be fixed in state law.

Aug 24

Colorado’s 2025 Special Session: Background and Bills Released So Far – TABOR Refund News

Here we go again! For the third year in a row, Governor Jared Polis has called the Legislature for a Special Session.

This year, they are meeting to address the nearly $1 billion shortfall that the State of Colorado is facing due to the tax cuts in HR 1, otherwise known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Natalie Menten is a Colorado politics expert and taxpayer advocate. She joined me to provide background on the Special Session, and explain what bills have already been introduced.

If you want to become an expert on the Colorado Legislature, this is a must-watch!