EDITORIAL: Voters Can Make Colorado History in PAWSD Election
The historic measure, written in election-legalese and printed in “all capital letters” for some un-Godly reason, reads like this:
PAGOSA AREA WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT BALLOT ISSUE A:
SHALL PAGOSA AREA WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT BE SUBJECT TO THE REVENUE, COLLECTION AND SPENDING LIMITS UNDER ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION (OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE TAXPAYERS BILL OF RIGHTS), SECTION 29-1-301, C.R.S., AND OTHER COLORADO LAWS BY REPEALING THE BALLOT ISSUE APPROVED BY DISTRICT VOTERS ON MAY 2, 2000; PROVIDED THAT 2016 SHALL BE USED AS THE BASE YEAR FOR CALCULATING LIMITS AND SUCH LIMITS SHALL BE EFFECTIVE BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2017?
You will want to vote “Yes” on this measure, if you wish to help the current PAWSD board — Mike Church, Glenn Walsh, Gordon McIver, Paul Hansen and Blake Brueckner — make political history.
The ballot language does not include the acronym “TABOR” — the more common way to refer to the Taxpayers Bill of Rights, Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution — but some voters may feel more comfortable marking “Yes” on their PAWSD ballot for Ballot Measure A, if they understand that a “Yes” vote will put our water and sewer district’s General Fund back under the taxing and spending controls offered by TABOR.
But don’t take my word for it.
The state of Colorado allows its citizens to submit statements in favor of, or in opposition to, ballot measures that increase or reduce taxes, and these statements are required to be mailed out to all registered voters. In the case of Ballot Measure A, no one submitted a statement opposing the measure, but PAWSD board member Glenn Walsh submitted a statement explaining why you might want to vote “Yes.”