Aug 31

Don’t buy The Sun’s spin: TABOR isn’t the reason Colorado’s roads are failing, it’s lawmakers’ misplaced priorities

It (The Sun) ignores the fact that TABOR doesn’t direct spending, the politicians running the state do.

#HandsOffTABOR
#DontBeFooled
#ItsYourMoneyNotTheirs
#TABOR
#FollowTheLaw
#FeesAreTaxes
#VoteOnFees
#ReplaceThemAllForNotFollowingVotersWishes

Don’t buy The Sun’s spin: TABOR isn’t the reason Colorado’s roads are failing, it’s lawmakers’ misplaced priorities

August 29, 2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By Cory Gaines | Commentary, Colorado Accountability Project

The Sun’s Gigafact check tries, but fails spectacularly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Sun has been doing yeoman’s work lately to get the progressive talking points on our state’s budget and TABOR out there. Their Gigafact check linked first below is a great example.

In answer to the question, “Has the condition of Colorado’s roads worsened under TABOR?”, their response is a resounding YES.

Let me pull some non-contiguous quotes. As a quick aside, the amount of text below is about 50% of the entire text in the fact check, a point I will return to shortly.

“The percentage of state roads in Colorado rated “poor” by the Federal Highway Administration has risen from 8% to 24% since the agency began collecting data in 1994, two years after the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights became law.”

“TABOR is a voter-approved constitutional amendment that limits how much tax revenue Colorado can collect and spend. Colorado’s gas tax, which funds much of the state’s $1.55 billion transportation budget — 48% of which goes to pavement maintenance annually — hasn’t changed since 1991 partly due to TABOR restrictions.”

The problems start with what I wrote right prior to the quotes. Determining the truth of a statement, especially one involving road funding in Colorado, is probably going to need a deeper look than than 150-odd words can provide.

If the Sun limited themselves to a literal interpretation of their title question, have the roads gotten worse under TABOR, then it is possible to determine the truth (or not) of the statement. Yes, the two events have indeed been coincident in time. They happened simultaneously.

But if you read that second quoted passage above again, you’ll see that they do not, in fact, limit themselves to such a question; it becomes pretty clear reading it that what they then do is to turn and try to link the condition of the roads to TABOR–an expansion of the question.

This is the failure.

It ignores the fact that TABOR doesn’t direct spending, the politicians running the state do.

It ignores the MULTIPLE fees that the state charges, some of which is supposed to go to the improvement of our roadways. See, for example, the second link below which is CDOT’s Statewide Bridge and Tunnel Enterprise which takes in fees and is supposed to use them to fund bridge and tunnel improvements, bridges and tunnels which are paved (and some of which are in dire need of repair from the pavement on down to the structure).

The last bit of trouble here is the Sun’s use of the recent American Society of Structural Engineer’s (ASCE) report about the condition of Colorado’s infrastructure to help inform their fact check. This ASCE report (see the third link below to an earlier newsletter) was a self-serving effort, also critical of TABOR, and informed by groups that do not like fiscal restraint.

Do not rely entirely on fact checks by any news outlet. There is nothing special about them. There is no heightened sense of fairness or truth involved; they are just as apt to mistakes or bias as any other “news” product.

As you can see above, there is sometimes quite the opposite: there is a redirection of what they originally set out to verify into advocacy.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/08/22/has-the-condition-of-colorados-roads-worsened-under-tabor/

https://www.codot.gov/programs/BridgeEnterprise

https://coloradoaccountabilityproject.substack.com/p/asce-leans-on-co-fiscal-institute?utm_source=publication-search

Related:

An earlier op ed I wrote about bias in fact checking.

https://completecolorado.com/2024/06/28/gaines-fact-checking-media-check-their-own-biases/

READ THE FULL COMMENTARY AT THE COLORADO ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT

 

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in commentary pieces are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the management of the Rocky Mountain Voice, but even so we support the constitutional right of the author to express those opinions.

https://rockymountainvoice.com/2025/08/29/dont-buy-the-suns-spin-tabor-isnt-the-reason-colorados-roads-are-failing-its-lawmakers-misplaced-priorities/

Posted in Colorado Accountability ProjectApprovedCommentaryState

 

Tagged in Colorado PoliticsColorado SunColorado Supreme CourtDemocrat LawmakersFiscal ResponsibilityGovernment spendingProgressive MediaRoad FundingTABORTaxpayer Rights

 

https://rockymountainvoice.com/2025/08/29/dont-buy-the-suns-spin-tabor-isnt-the-reason-colorados-roads-are-failing-its-lawmakers-misplaced-priorities/

 

Aug 24

What to Expect During Colorado’s Special Session – Advance Colorado Rundown

Michael Fields and Kristi Burton Brown preview Gov. Polis’ upcoming call for another special session. It’s going to be focused on the budget, but why do liberals want to insist on taxing overtime and tips? What does polling say about this? And, there’s no question that a key public safety issue should be added if the legislature returns to the Capitol in August – it’s one that District Attorneys across the political spectrum agree must be fixed in state law.

Aug 24

Colorado’s 2025 Special Session: Background and Bills Released So Far – TABOR Refund News

Here we go again! For the third year in a row, Governor Jared Polis has called the Legislature for a Special Session.

This year, they are meeting to address the nearly $1 billion shortfall that the State of Colorado is facing due to the tax cuts in HR 1, otherwise known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Natalie Menten is a Colorado politics expert and taxpayer advocate. She joined me to provide background on the Special Session, and explain what bills have already been introduced.

If you want to become an expert on the Colorado Legislature, this is a must-watch!

Aug 24

Colorado Democrats have long been critical of TABOR—the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights.

FYI:
Colorado Democrats have long been critical of TABOR—the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights.

? What Is TABOR?
TABOR is a constitutional amendment passed in 1992 that:
• Limits how much revenue Colorado can collect and spend.
• Requires voter approval for any tax increases.
• Mandates refunds to taxpayers when revenue exceeds a cap based on inflation and population growth.
It’s popular among many voters for its taxpayer protections.

?? Colorado Democratic Party position on TABOR
Colorado Democrats have consistently expressed frustration with TABOR’s constraints since it blocks their unlimited spending. Here’s what recent reporting shows:
• Ongoing Efforts: Democrats have tried for decades to dismantle TABOR. Despite controlling the state government for seven years straight, they’ve made little headway due to TABOR’s popularity and constitutional entrenchment.
• Recent Moves: In 2025, some Democratic lawmakers introduced a resolution to direct the legislature’s legal team to file a lawsuit challenging TABOR’s constitutionality. The argument was that TABOR violates the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of a “republican form of government” by requiring voter approval for tax increases.
• Internal Disagreement: While many Democrats agree TABOR is problematic, they’re divided on how to address it—whether through legal challenges, ballot measures, or incremental reforms.
• Platform Status: There’s clear evidence that “Repeal TABOR” is an official plank in the statewide Democratic platform and is certainly a recurring theme in their legislative agenda and public statements.

?? Political Reality
Despite Democratic control, TABOR remains intact because:
• Voter Resistance: Ballot measures to retain excess revenue (Propositions CC in 2019 and HH in 2023) were rejected by voters.
• Strategic Caution: Democrats are wary of political backlash, especially in swing districts or rural areas where TABOR is popular.

? Summary
So, while many Colorado Democrats strongly oppose TABOR and some have pursued legal and legislative avenues to weaken or eliminate it, it’s accurate to say the party has officially declared war on TABOR in its platform. The issue is deeply divisive, both within the party and among voters.

#HandsOffTABOR
#DontBeFooled
#ItsYourMoneyNotTheirs
#TABOR
#FollowTheLaw
#FeesAreTaxes
#VoteOnFees
#ReplaceThemAllForNotFollowingVotersWishes

Aug 19

Colorado’s 2025 Special Session: Background and Bills Released So Far – TABOR Refund News

Here we go again!
For the third year in a row, Governor Jared Polis has called the Legislature for a Special Session.
This year, they are meeting to address the nearly $1 billion shortfall that the State of Colorado is facing due to the tax cuts in HR 1, otherwise known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Natalie Menten is a Colorado politics expert and taxpayer advocate.
She joined me to provide background on the Special Session, and explain what bills have already been introduced.
If you want to become an expert on the Colorado Legislature, this is a must-watch!

Aug 19

???Chainsaw Caucus: Dems’ Tax Trick in CO! ???

ChainsawCaucus @ChainsawCaucus posted this today on X (Twitter):

???Chainsaw Caucus: Dems’ Tax Trick in CO! ???

? Democrats are dodging TABOR with a Motte-and-Bailey scam: claiming taxes haven’t risen or the budget is balanced (motte) while piling on fees that act like taxes (bailey). Coloradans are paying the price! ?

How It Works:

? Motte: “No tax hikes! TABOR ties our hands, so we use fees for roads, schools, healthcare.” They lean on the 4.25% income tax rate and small cuts (0.38% since 2018).

? Bailey: Fees exploded to $25.8B in 2024—$4,322 per Coloradan, a 3,369% jump since 1994. That’s a hidden tax hike equal to a 7.68% income tax rate!

Fee Fallout (2019–2024):

– ? College fees up 26.1% (e.g., CU Boulder + 14.28% to $41,943).

– ? DMV fees up $4 (HB25-1189), plus $3 car insurance fees (HB25-1303).

– ?? Restaurant fees + 25% (SB285).

– ?? $5.4B in transport fees (SB21-260).

– ? Non-education fees hit $1,382 per person (2024), up from $97 (2000).

The Trick: Dems use TABOR-exempt enterprises (10 new ones since 2020, $124.3M in FY24) and cite court rulings to avoid voter approval. They even pushed HJR25-1023 to challenge TABOR’s constitutionality! ?

Impact: Fees cost families ~ $4,500/yr (Advance CO). Voters rejected Prop HH (2023) by **18 pts**, showing **70%+** support TABOR on X. Stop the fee frenzy!

?? Fight Back: Initiative 2025-2026 #136 could require voter OK for big fees by 2027. Demand accountability! How are fees hitting you?

https://x.com/ChainsawCaucus/status/1957092257548648955

 

#HandsOffTABOR
#DontBeFooled
#ItsYourMoneyNotTheirs
#TABOR
#FollowTheLaw
#FeesAreTaxes
#VoteOnFees
#ReplaceThemAllForNotFollowingVotersWishes

Aug 18

Special Session Study Group: Taxes v. Fees

One of Colorado government’s favorite games is to whine about TABOR, while actively subverting it through “fees.”

A report from the Common Sense Institute reveals that Colorado’s state spending exempt from the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) has risen by nearly 30% since 1996.

TABOR limits the amount of revenue the state can retain each year, but exempts certain sources such as voter-approved changes, federal funds, and state enterprises. State enterprises — lottery, health insurance etc. — generate revenue through providing goods or services.

In 1996, 46% of Colorado’s total state spending (about $5,264 per resident) was “exempt from TABOR;” by fiscal year 2024, that share increased to 74%, amounting to just over $9,000 per resident.

Consider that for a moment. “Exempt from the Taxpayer Bill of Rights.”

Something is deeply wrong with that framing.

Colorado Politics broke this story, quoting  the study authors Erik Gamm and Judah Weir, “‘The more that fee increases assume the character of tax increases, especially in the aftermath of Proposition 117, the more appropriate it becomes to characterize them as such,’ …adding that fee revenue growth is driving Colorado’s ‘tax burdens’ without giving citizens a say in the process.”

https://coloradofreepress.com/special-session-study-group-taxes-v-fees/