Category Archives: Ballot Initiative

Sep 04

Ballot measure seeks tax hike for higher income earners in 2026

Posted on by

A coalition led by a Colorado think tank will file a ballot initiative on Wednesday to raise state income tax rates on annual household incomes and corporations with earnings above $500,000.

The ballot measure, which sets up a “graduated” income tax, would also provide a tax break for households with incomes below the $500,000 threshold.

Broadly speaking, under a graduated income tax — which is also known as “progressive” tax — the rates are divided into brackets. The lower brackets pay a smaller rate; the higher levels are taxed a bigger rate. A graduated system would eliminate Colorado’s flat tax rate.

Under the coalition’s proposal, the higher bracket would pay more so that even with the tax break for incomes below $500,000, the graduated system would still pull in a bigger net revenue for the state government.

Click (HERE) to continue reading this TABOR article at Colorado Politics

Aug 24

Colorado Democrats have long been critical of TABOR—the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights.

Posted on by

FYI:
Colorado Democrats have long been critical of TABOR—the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights.

? What Is TABOR?
TABOR is a constitutional amendment passed in 1992 that:
• Limits how much revenue Colorado can collect and spend.
• Requires voter approval for any tax increases.
• Mandates refunds to taxpayers when revenue exceeds a cap based on inflation and population growth.
It’s popular among many voters for its taxpayer protections.

?? Colorado Democratic Party position on TABOR
Colorado Democrats have consistently expressed frustration with TABOR’s constraints since it blocks their unlimited spending. Here’s what recent reporting shows:
• Ongoing Efforts: Democrats have tried for decades to dismantle TABOR. Despite controlling the state government for seven years straight, they’ve made little headway due to TABOR’s popularity and constitutional entrenchment.
• Recent Moves: In 2025, some Democratic lawmakers introduced a resolution to direct the legislature’s legal team to file a lawsuit challenging TABOR’s constitutionality. The argument was that TABOR violates the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of a “republican form of government” by requiring voter approval for tax increases.
• Internal Disagreement: While many Democrats agree TABOR is problematic, they’re divided on how to address it—whether through legal challenges, ballot measures, or incremental reforms.
• Platform Status: There’s clear evidence that “Repeal TABOR” is an official plank in the statewide Democratic platform and is certainly a recurring theme in their legislative agenda and public statements.

?? Political Reality
Despite Democratic control, TABOR remains intact because:
• Voter Resistance: Ballot measures to retain excess revenue (Propositions CC in 2019 and HH in 2023) were rejected by voters.
• Strategic Caution: Democrats are wary of political backlash, especially in swing districts or rural areas where TABOR is popular.

? Summary
So, while many Colorado Democrats strongly oppose TABOR and some have pursued legal and legislative avenues to weaken or eliminate it, it’s accurate to say the party has officially declared war on TABOR in its platform. The issue is deeply divisive, both within the party and among voters.

#HandsOffTABOR
#DontBeFooled
#ItsYourMoneyNotTheirs
#TABOR
#FollowTheLaw
#FeesAreTaxes
#VoteOnFees
#ReplaceThemAllForNotFollowingVotersWishes

Step Up. Speak Out. Defend TABOR.

Featured

Posted on by

The TABOR Foundation is looking to revive its’ speaker’s bureau.  Many of you will remember that we tried, with mixed results, to establish a speakers’ bureau to provide speakers for interested groups around the Denver metro area and across the state.  The goal, of course, is to educate people about the value of The Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights in limiting the state’s ability to tax its citizens.

 

In our past efforts to make the speakers’ bureau work, we had our ducks in a row—for the most part.  We have developed a PowerPoint presentation and have a laptop computer dedicated to that presentation.  We acquired a digital projector and a screen specifically for our speakers.  We also were able to tap into expert help with our messaging and for polishing our presenters’ skills.

 So, where’s the weak link?  Clearly, it’s in getting speaking engagements scheduled.  Doing so requires someone willing to make calls to groups that are looking for speakers for their (usually monthly) meetings.  To this point, we have had one person who committed to making calls to schedule speakers.

Let’s be honest.  There’s some tedium involved in scheduling these engagements.  The scheduler will typically need to contact the person in the organization who is responsible for the group’s programs.  There’s phone tag.  Or, you get to speak to the correct person only to find out that someone else has taken over the responsibility, and you’ll need to speak to him.

On the positive side, we plan to start approaching friendly groups—other like-minded organizations where members would be most receptive to our message.  Conversations tend to be easy.  Callers would likely find their calls to be well received.  It may take some patience to find a meeting time that matches our speaker’s schedule—a bit more tedium—but the person on the other end of the line will probably be helpful and cooperative.

Here’s the part where we want to improve on past efforts.  We’d like to find two volunteers who would commit to scheduling two speaking engagements per month.  Perhaps better still would be to find four callers, each of whom would commit to scheduling one engagement per month.  Assuming we can find multiple callers, we should probably plan on regular (monthly?) discussions to talk about how things are going and to address challenges people may be having.  I guess the bottom line is that we need volunteers who care about limited government and who want to contribute to the effort to rein in government excesses.

We’re asking for your help.  If you would be able to commit maybe a couple of hours per month to schedule engagements for us, I’d very much like to talk to you.  Or, if you might know of someone who would be willing to take on this role, I’d like to speak to you with the hope that you would make an introduction.

Bob Foland
Executive Director, The TABOR Foundation

TheTABORfoundation@gmail.com
Info@TheTABORcommittee.com

 

May 19

What is TABOR: The Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights? – Advance Colorado Rundown

Posted on by

Advance Colorado Executive Vice President Kristi Burton Brown gives a brief history and explanation of Colorado’s unique taxpayer protection: the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights. This revenue cap limits the state government’s ability to spend taxpayer dollars and requires refunds to be sent to Coloradans when the government collects beyond the limit.

May 06

Colorado Democrats fail to challenge TABOR as legislative session nears end

Posted on by

Colorado Democrats fail to advance their resolution challenging the Taxpayer Bill of Rights before the legislative session ends Wednesday.

DENVER — A Democratic-led effort to challenge Colorado’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) will not advance before the legislative session ends Wednesday, despite the party’s complete control of state government.

State Rep. Sean Camacho, D-Denver, who sponsored a resolution to initiate a lawsuit seeking to have TABOR ruled unconstitutional, confirmed the measure will not receive a vote before midnight, ensuring the resolution will not have enough time to go through all the steps in the House and Senate by Wednesday.

“It is not happening,” Camacho said.

He did not know why it was not being put to a vote, and as of Monday night, a spokesman for House Speaker Julie McCluskie, D-Dillion, had not responded to an 12:35 p.m. text message regarding the vote.

TABOR, which has been state law since 1992, limits how much revenue Colorado can collect and spend each year. It also requires refunds to taxpayers when the state exceeds those limits. Democrats have increasingly cited TABOR as the reason behind this year’s $1 billion in state spending cuts.

To continue reading the rest of this story, click (HERE) to go to 9 News

May 03

Colorado Lawmakers Push to Sue Taxpayers — Using Taxpayer Money

Posted on by

Colorado Lawmakers Push to Sue Taxpayers — Using Taxpayer Money

Colorado taxpayers and voters are on high alert after the introduction of House Joint Resolution HJR25-1023, sponsored by Democrat Representatives Sean Camacho and Lorena García and Democrat Senators. Lindsey Daugherty and Iman Jodeh. This resolution would initiate a taxpayer-funded lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR).  TABOR was a citizen-initiated, and Colorado voter-approved, constitutional measure in 1992 and has been protecting taxpayers for over thirty years. Republican Representatives and Senators have publicly and vigorously expressed opposition to the resolution.

Ironically, this legal attack, led by Democrat sponsors, would be paid for by the very people TABOR was designed to protect.

The sponsors argue that TABOR violates the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of a “republican form of government” — claiming that only elected lawmakers should decide tax policy, not voters. But that argument flatly contradicts Colorado’s own history and the words of a former Democratic governor.

In August 1910, Governor John F. Shafroth called a special legislative session to enshrine the citizen right to initiative and referendum into the Colorado Constitution. His message to the General Assembly, reprinted in The Walsenburg World (Aug. 11, 1910), made the purpose clear:

“The law of the Initiative and Referendum places the government nearer to the people, and that has always been the aim of the framers of all republican forms of government.”

A Democrat said that. And yet in 2025, Democrats are sponsoring a resolution to sue the people for using those very rights.

Last Thursday, I hand-delivered that quote and the historical context to legislators — sliding it under many office doors in hopes it would be read without me there. In the chaos of the session’s final days, I can only hope some of them reflect on how far their party has drifted.

There are rumors the sponsors might delay action on the resolution this session out of political caution and risking their seats in fiscally conservative districts. But don’t relax — they’ve already said they are preparing a 2026 ballot measure to dismantle TABOR. It’s predicted to resemble 2005’s Ref C, so voters should brace for misleading ballot language and long-term consequences.

Here’s what Ref C did: Taxpayers forfeited TABOR refunds for 5-years and let the state permanently keep billions beyond the voter-approved revenue cap.

REF C fiscal impact:
From 1992 – 2004, TABOR has refunded about $11.98 billion to taxpayers.
In contrast, Ref C has allowed the state to retain over $37.23 billion. That’s three times more money kept by government than returned to the people.

That $37.23 billion is in addition to the allowed reasonable TABOR cap of letting government tax revenue grow by inflation + population.

That’s what’s at stake — not just dollars, but your constitutional right to say no.

Natalie Menten
TABOR Board Member

 

 

 

Continue reading →

Apr 27

Majority Democrats move to slam door on Colorado citizen engagement

Posted on by

A new Democrat-backed bill moving rapidly through the Colorado legislature poses a serious threat to one of the most fundamental rights in our state Constitution: the right of citizens to initiate laws through the petition process.

And hot on the heels of that is yet another legislative attack on the Colorado Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR).

House Bill 25-1327, which has already passed both the House and the Senate State, Veterans, and Military Affairs Committee, would significantly restrict the ability of Coloradans to bring citizen initiatives forward. Among other provisions, it shortens an already tight timeline for title-setting, imposes new procedural hurdles, and adds new fines of up to $1,500 on petition organizers for non-compliance with reporting requirements. Continue reading →

Apr 14

If you’re reading this, pause and send a letter to your CO Rep/Senator in opposition to HJR25-1023

Posted on by

Priscilla Rahn @RahnforDougCo

If you’re reading this, pause and send a letter to your CO Rep/Senator. Here is my letter on Res 1023 (Lawsuit to eliminate TABOR.) Can you believe Democrats want to use our public tax dollars to sue “WE THE PEOPLE?” HANDS OFF TABOR!
—-
To the Honorable Members of the Colorado General Assembly,

I write to you in opposition of House Joint Resolution 25-1023, which seeks to challenge the constitutionality of the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR), Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution.

This resolution proposes a lawsuit alleging that TABOR violates the Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution and the Colorado Enabling Act by limiting the legislature’s authority over taxation and spending.

The claims against TABOR are constitutionally unsound and ignore both the sovereign will of the people of Colorado and foundational principles of federalism and state constitutional self-determination.

1. TABOR Is a Legitimate Exercise of Constitutional Amendment Power
The Colorado Constitution, Article V, Section 1, enshrines the power of the people to legislate through initiative and referendum, a principle established since our state’s founding. This power includes the ability to amend the Constitution directly — as was done with the adoption of TABOR in 1992.

2. The Guarantee Clause Does Not Prohibit Direct Democracy
The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently treated claims under this clause as nonjusticiable political questions. The presence of direct democracy in a state — such as ballot initiatives — has never been held to violate the republican form of government. Many states, including Colorado, have long utilized ballot measures as an enhancement to representative democracy, not a threat to it.

3. TABOR Reinforces Accountability and Fiscal Restraint
TABOR was adopted after years of public concern over unchecked government spending and tax increases. It does not abolish the legislature’s power — it simply requires consent from voters before taxes are raised or new debt is incurred.

TABOR protects Coloradans by ensuring:
• Transparency in budgeting and taxation
• Taxpayer control over fiscal expansion
• A clear and predictable structure for government finance.

4. TABOR Reflects the Ongoing Will of the People
TABOR has survived multiple attempts at repeal or revision, and the voters have repeatedly affirmed its core protections. Any legislative attempt to sue the people’s will out of existence — without first repealing TABOR through democratic means — risks undermining public confidence in both this body and our constitutional process.

Instead of litigating against the will of the people, I urge you to honor our voices.

#HandsOffTABOR
#DontBeFooled
#ItsYourMoneyNotTheirs
#TABOR
#FollowTheLaw
#FeesAreTaxes
#VoteOnFees
#ReplaceThemAllForNotFollowingVotersWishes

https://x.com/RahnforDougCo/status/1911082221416349714

Apr 08

Colorado Dems push resolution to sue over TABOR

Posted on by
FNF Colorado State Capitol, Denver, dome
Colorado State Capitol in Denver
Photo by Paul Moody on Unsplash
(The Center Square) – Colorado Democrats are looking to challenge the constitutionality of the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights in court again.

A joint resolution introduced this week, if passed, would require the Committee on Legal Services to hire legal counsel and file a lawsuit over TABOR on behalf of the General Assembly.

TABOR, which was added to the state constitution after voters passed it in 1992, requires voter approval for all proposed tax increases. It also reins in state spending by limiting revenue growth to inflation plus the rate of population growth. Any revenue surplus must be refunded to taxpayers under the constitutional amendment.

Democrats have long pointed to TABOR for the state’s budget woes. Joint Budget Committee Chair Jeff Bridges, D-Greenwood Village, on Thursday pointed to TABOR after the Senate passed the state’s $43.9 billion budget bill and dealt with a $1.2 billion deficit.

“This is a budget that no one is happy with but that everyone can be proud of,” he said in a statement. “Thanks to the rationing equation in TABOR, the Joint Budget Committee faced difficult decisions that resulted in painful tradeoffs. But unlike Washington, we made these cuts thoughtfully, strategically and with bipartisan support. We eliminated dozens of programs and invested those savings in public education and public safety and public lands.”

“It’s not a perfect budget, but it’s responsible and responsive to our TABOR constraints while keeping our commitment to the people of Colorado,” Bridges added.

Conservative advocacy groups and defenders of TABOR point to the majority Democrats’ bloated spending as the issue.

“The problem isn’t that people are taxed too little. The problem is that state government is spending too much,” Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer, a Republican on the JBC, said on the Senate floor Thursday. “It is our moral duty to justify every dollar that we spend. So the first step needs to define our priorities because if you think everything should be funded, if you think everything is a priority, you essentially have no priority.”

To continue reading the rest of this article, please click (HERE) to go to The Center Square