Oct 16

Wednesday hearing ramps up discussion on ballot initiative to create progressive income-tax system

A person puts a ballot into an election box in front of a Colorado flag.

Though the 2026 election remains nearly 13 months away, debate is heating up around a proposed initiative that would replace Colorado’s flat 4.4% income tax with a graduated system that imposes higher tax rates on businesses and individuals with higher incomes.

A coalition led by the Bell Policy Center is pushing the proposal, which is estimated to lower taxes for any person or company making less than $500,000 a year and raise them for those making more. The proposal is expected to bring in between $2.4 billion and $3.25 billion in its first year, and at least one version of the initiative proscribes that new money would go to public education, health care, child care and non-policing programs meant to improve public safety.

The effort ran into a setback Wednesday before the state Title-Setting Board, which ruled unanimously that it deals with more than one subject, which is illegal under Colorado law. But rather than stop the initiative, the decision will require its backers, which also include groups like the Colorado Children’s Campaign and Colorado Consumer Health Initiative, to rewrite the proposal, potentially breaking it into multiple measures.

To continue reading the rest of this story, please click (HERE).

Sep 04

Ballot measure seeks tax hike for higher income earners in 2026

A coalition led by a Colorado think tank will file a ballot initiative on Wednesday to raise state income tax rates on annual household incomes and corporations with earnings above $500,000.

The ballot measure, which sets up a “graduated” income tax, would also provide a tax break for households with incomes below the $500,000 threshold.

Broadly speaking, under a graduated income tax — which is also known as “progressive” tax — the rates are divided into brackets. The lower brackets pay a smaller rate; the higher levels are taxed a bigger rate. A graduated system would eliminate Colorado’s flat tax rate.

Under the coalition’s proposal, the higher bracket would pay more so that even with the tax break for incomes below $500,000, the graduated system would still pull in a bigger net revenue for the state government.

Click (HERE) to continue reading this TABOR article at Colorado Politics

Aug 24

What to Expect During Colorado’s Special Session – Advance Colorado Rundown

Michael Fields and Kristi Burton Brown preview Gov. Polis’ upcoming call for another special session. It’s going to be focused on the budget, but why do liberals want to insist on taxing overtime and tips? What does polling say about this? And, there’s no question that a key public safety issue should be added if the legislature returns to the Capitol in August – it’s one that District Attorneys across the political spectrum agree must be fixed in state law.

Aug 19

???Chainsaw Caucus: Dems’ Tax Trick in CO! ???

ChainsawCaucus @ChainsawCaucus posted this today on X (Twitter):

???Chainsaw Caucus: Dems’ Tax Trick in CO! ???

? Democrats are dodging TABOR with a Motte-and-Bailey scam: claiming taxes haven’t risen or the budget is balanced (motte) while piling on fees that act like taxes (bailey). Coloradans are paying the price! ?

How It Works:

? Motte: “No tax hikes! TABOR ties our hands, so we use fees for roads, schools, healthcare.” They lean on the 4.25% income tax rate and small cuts (0.38% since 2018).

? Bailey: Fees exploded to $25.8B in 2024—$4,322 per Coloradan, a 3,369% jump since 1994. That’s a hidden tax hike equal to a 7.68% income tax rate!

Fee Fallout (2019–2024):

– ? College fees up 26.1% (e.g., CU Boulder + 14.28% to $41,943).

– ? DMV fees up $4 (HB25-1189), plus $3 car insurance fees (HB25-1303).

– ?? Restaurant fees + 25% (SB285).

– ?? $5.4B in transport fees (SB21-260).

– ? Non-education fees hit $1,382 per person (2024), up from $97 (2000).

The Trick: Dems use TABOR-exempt enterprises (10 new ones since 2020, $124.3M in FY24) and cite court rulings to avoid voter approval. They even pushed HJR25-1023 to challenge TABOR’s constitutionality! ?

Impact: Fees cost families ~ $4,500/yr (Advance CO). Voters rejected Prop HH (2023) by **18 pts**, showing **70%+** support TABOR on X. Stop the fee frenzy!

?? Fight Back: Initiative 2025-2026 #136 could require voter OK for big fees by 2027. Demand accountability! How are fees hitting you?

https://x.com/ChainsawCaucus/status/1957092257548648955

 

#HandsOffTABOR
#DontBeFooled
#ItsYourMoneyNotTheirs
#TABOR
#FollowTheLaw
#FeesAreTaxes
#VoteOnFees
#ReplaceThemAllForNotFollowingVotersWishes

Jul 30

Colo. Conservative Group Says New OT Law Violates TABOR

Colorado’s new overtime law, which requires overtime deducted from federal gross income to be added back to a taxpayer’s federal taxable income for state income tax, violates TABOR….

To read the rest of this story, please click (HERE) to go to Law360.

 

Jul 25

Governor sued over state’s plan to keep tax on overtime

LEGISLATURE

Governor sued over state’s plan to keep tax on overtime
Policymakers grapple with the effects of GOP’s federal tax law
By Seth Klamann

A conservative advocacy group and a state senator sued Gov. Jared Polis and the head of Colorado’s tax agency Thursday, alleging that recent legislation requiring the continued taxing of overtime pay — in the face of federal changes — violates the state constitution.

The lawsuit, filed in Denver District Court, argues that House Bill 1296 violates the state’s Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, or TABOR, which requires voter approval before the state can levy new taxes.

HB-1296, which Polis signed into law in May, requires the state to continue taxing overtime starting next year — and it was passed in anticipation of a provision in Congress’ tax law this month that temporarily will allow workers to deduct a large portion of overtime from their federal taxes.

Colorado’s law was drafted as federal debates about cutting taxes on overtime — a campaign promise by President Donald Trump — were developing. Now lawmakers are grappling with the potential for hundreds of millions of dollars in cuts to state funding resulting from the final tax bill.

The new lawsuit, which Democrats dismissed as a political stunt, was filed by Advance Colorado and Republican Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer, as well as by a Fremont County commissioner, Kevin Grantham — a former Senate president — and two Coloradans who receive overtime pay.

Income declared on earners’ state tax return typically is influenced by what is on their federal tax forms. The lawsuit alleges that restarting the overtime taxation at the state level constitutes the creation of new revenue, which would require voter approval, and it asks a judge to invalidate the law.

The state legislation didn’t necessarily create a new tax, although it changed the collection mechanism to ensure that tax on overtime still was collected regardless of federal changes. Functionally, it continues a tax on overtime income that the federal government now allows to be deducted to a significant degree — up to $12,500 annually — for the next four years.

Michael Fields, the president of Advance Colorado, accused Democratic lawmakers of trying to sidestep TABOR and voter approval.

Continue reading

May 19

What is TABOR: The Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights? – Advance Colorado Rundown

Advance Colorado Executive Vice President Kristi Burton Brown gives a brief history and explanation of Colorado’s unique taxpayer protection: the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights. This revenue cap limits the state government’s ability to spend taxpayer dollars and requires refunds to be sent to Coloradans when the government collects beyond the limit.

May 06

Colorado Democrats fail to challenge TABOR as legislative session nears end

Colorado Democrats fail to advance their resolution challenging the Taxpayer Bill of Rights before the legislative session ends Wednesday.

DENVER — A Democratic-led effort to challenge Colorado’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) will not advance before the legislative session ends Wednesday, despite the party’s complete control of state government.

State Rep. Sean Camacho, D-Denver, who sponsored a resolution to initiate a lawsuit seeking to have TABOR ruled unconstitutional, confirmed the measure will not receive a vote before midnight, ensuring the resolution will not have enough time to go through all the steps in the House and Senate by Wednesday.

“It is not happening,” Camacho said.

He did not know why it was not being put to a vote, and as of Monday night, a spokesman for House Speaker Julie McCluskie, D-Dillion, had not responded to an 12:35 p.m. text message regarding the vote.

TABOR, which has been state law since 1992, limits how much revenue Colorado can collect and spend each year. It also requires refunds to taxpayers when the state exceeds those limits. Democrats have increasingly cited TABOR as the reason behind this year’s $1 billion in state spending cuts.

To continue reading the rest of this story, click (HERE) to go to 9 News

Mar 03

What is TABOR: The Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights? – Advance Colorado Rundown

Advance Colorado Executive Vice President Kristi Burton Brown gives a brief history and explanation of Colorado’s unique taxpayer protection: the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights. This revenue cap limits the state government’s ability to spend taxpayer dollars and requires refunds to be sent to Coloradans when the government collects beyond the limit.

What is TABOR: The Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights? – Advance Colorado Rundown – Advance Colorado Rundown – Omny.fm