I support all you are doing. A handful of years ago, a corporation convinced the city of Sheridan to condemn a storage lot among other business so it could build the ‘Riverfront’, Target ect. the owner spent lots of money fighting it, I spoke at a hearing to no avail. Shortly the swat team of Sheridan came and raided the lot chaining the gates and setting up a command post for people to begin removing property.
I’m pretty sure I’m going to vote for 2A, but I have to tell you that linking it to Tabor is the first thing I’ve come across that makes me reconsider my vote. On the local level with what’s happening in Littleton, one community, 2A is something I support in a place that’s “built out” already, and the projects that are ongoing are an impediment to quality of life here. On a state wide level, in a state where we have one of the highest growth rates in the nation, it has proven itself to be a hindrance over time, and will be even more so going forward. I hate to see this initiative (2A) get politicized this way.
John Zeck replying to John Zeck comment of Feb. 17, 2015. My thinking has evolved on this, and I’m voting No on Prop 300. Interesting how thinking changes over time, and since 2015 the housing shortage has become a much bigger concern, and the housing shortage seems to be the impetus behind 300. Having special elections at the cost of 160K more frequently, and not trusting our duly elected City Council, doesn’t seem to be the Littleton Way. Let’s enjoy the wonderful city that we are, and enjoy what we are becoming, with the young leadership that we have.
I support all you are doing. A handful of years ago, a corporation convinced the city of Sheridan to condemn a storage lot among other business so it could build the ‘Riverfront’, Target ect. the owner spent lots of money fighting it, I spoke at a hearing to no avail. Shortly the swat team of Sheridan came and raided the lot chaining the gates and setting up a command post for people to begin removing property.
I’m pretty sure I’m going to vote for 2A, but I have to tell you that linking it to Tabor is the first thing I’ve come across that makes me reconsider my vote. On the local level with what’s happening in Littleton, one community, 2A is something I support in a place that’s “built out” already, and the projects that are ongoing are an impediment to quality of life here. On a state wide level, in a state where we have one of the highest growth rates in the nation, it has proven itself to be a hindrance over time, and will be even more so going forward. I hate to see this initiative (2A) get politicized this way.
John Zeck replying to John Zeck comment of Feb. 17, 2015. My thinking has evolved on this, and I’m voting No on Prop 300. Interesting how thinking changes over time, and since 2015 the housing shortage has become a much bigger concern, and the housing shortage seems to be the impetus behind 300. Having special elections at the cost of 160K more frequently, and not trusting our duly elected City Council, doesn’t seem to be the Littleton Way. Let’s enjoy the wonderful city that we are, and enjoy what we are becoming, with the young leadership that we have.